Strengthening nutrition incentive and produce prescription projects

An examination of a capacity building and innovation fund

Authors

  • Sarah A. Stotz Colorado State University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4107-3313
  • Hollyanne Fricke Gretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition
  • Carmen Byker Shanks Gretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition
  • Megan Reynolds Gretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition
  • Tessa Lasswell Gretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition
  • Laurel Sanville Gretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6769-4049
  • Rachel Hoh Fair Food Network
  • Courtney A. Parks Gretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2024.132.016

Keywords:

nutrition financial incentive, produce prescription program, funding needs, capacity building, food insecurity, innovation, technical assistance center, U.S. Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture

Abstract

The Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program (GusNIP), funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), is a federal program designed to address financial barriers to fruit and vegetable (FV) purchases among consumers with a low income by using financial incentives. To fur­ther strengthen both nutrition incentive (NI) and produce prescription (PPR) GusNIP projects, the GusNIP Nutrition Incentive Training, Technical Assistance, Evalu­ation, and Information Center (NTAE) and its Nutrition Incentive Hub offer Capacity Building and Innovation Fund (CBIF) awards to GusNIP grantees and their partner organizations. The present study applies multiple methods to systematically understand the types of resources requested by CBIF applicants to expand the capacity and impact of their NI and PPR pro­jects by rigorously analyzing the CBIF proposals submitted from 2020 to 2022. Applicants (N = 130) requested funds to build capacity and innova­tion around one or more domains: leadership and staffing (n = 72); communications (n = 67); diver­sity, equity, and inclusion (DEI; n = 57); and tech­nology (n = 42). Three significant qualitative themes emerged around future needs: (1) staffing and technology to streamline applicants’  projects; (2) training, resources, and funding to enhance DEI in their projects; and (3) improved NTAE support, including improvements to the CBIF funding mechanism. Findings from this study can increase awareness about the capacity building and innovation needs of NI and PPR projects for the NTAE, policymakers, and funders to consider when supporting healthy food financial incentive projects.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Sarah A. Stotz, Colorado State University

PhD, MS, RDN, CDCES; Assistant Professor, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition

Hollyanne Fricke, Gretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition

MPH; Associate Scientist

Carmen Byker Shanks, Gretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition

PhD, RDN; Principal Research Scientist and Associate Project Director for Reporting and Evaluation

Megan Reynolds, Gretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition

MPH, RDN; Research Associate, Gretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition

Tessa Lasswell, Gretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition

MPH, RDN; Consultant Program Advisor

Laurel Sanville, Gretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition

MS, RDN; Consultant Program Advisor

Rachel Hoh, Fair Food Network

MA, MS; Senior Manager of Nutrition Incentives

Courtney A. Parks, Gretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition

PhD; Senior Research Scientist

Published

2024-03-15

How to Cite

Stotz, S., Fricke, H., Byker Shanks, C., Reynolds, M., Lasswell, T., Sanville, L., Hoh, R., & Parks, C. (2024). Strengthening nutrition incentive and produce prescription projects: An examination of a capacity building and innovation fund. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 13(2), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2024.132.016

Most read articles by the same author(s)