Right-to-farm laws: Legal shields of Big Ag
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2026.152.018
Keywords:
agricultural law, state laws, U.S. food policy, concentrated animal feeding operations, agricultural consolidation, rural developmentAbstract
First paragraph:
In the 1970s and 1980s, U.S. agriculture faced its worst crisis since the Great Depression. Dire finances due to collapsed land and commodity prices forced almost a third of farms nationwide to close, negatively affecting rural economies beyond farming (Barnett, 2000). During this period, right-to-farm (RTF) state laws were enacted to protect farmers from nuisance lawsuits resulting from agricultural practices, such as complaints about noise or odor. These laws were promoted to safeguard family farms and slow down the urbanization of rural areas, a trend contributing to the emergence of post-agrarian rural societies in the U.S. (Salamon, 2007). In Empty Fields, Empty Promises, authors Ashwood, Imlay, Kuehn, Franco, and Diamond critically examine how far RTF laws have diverged from their original intent and now instead protect large-scale operations, such as concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs). . . .
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Roland Ebel

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright to all content published in JAFSCD belongs to the author(s). It is licensed as CC BY 4.0. This license determines how you may reprint, copy, distribute, or otherwise share JAFSCD content.






